The various actors in the mode are the
ones who start the creation. Thank you
for making it. There is no different
character at any time. The organizers.
Yes, I said yes. Serva, that's a
different character. But the whole
women, however, when he reached before
the previous year, Serva didn't change
one of them. In Hungary, it's just a
slightly different ability, the European
Union's gold reserve. The most important
different ability is in Serbia. Serbia
has no different ability. And what is
going on here? Firefighters and their
different skills in Serbia. Their
different skills in Serbia. Another
different skill. Serbia is second with
its landslides. I think the
firefighters, the experience, and the
prime minister are still struggling
hard. I wish you a good evening. How are
the battles going now in more and more
They say that the consensus based on
article 1 and 22 should be abandoned. We
already hear this in connection with our
Russian assets and we hear this in
connection with the common judgment.
Well, here's a historical mistake. So,
the circumstance is that the six-monthly
decision on frozen Russian assets, which
always required unonymity, was
abolished, circumvented, undermined, and
they figured out that instead of
unonymity, a majority decision could be
made. I think that's a historical
mistake. This will have very serious
consequences. It is clear that we are
dealing with a miscarriage of justice.
That is a clear violation of the law.
They are using a section of the basic
treaty for this decision that has
nothing to do with this situation. This
is something that is done in member
states, but it is a clear violation of
the law. Such a position cannot be
defended in courts. However, the union
has embarked on this very dangerous path
and indeed from now on the question is
open. If they could violate the law
once, bypass the member states, they
could do it again. Here is another
completely different area but similar
problem. This is the issue of Mr. Merus
where they want to sign the Mr. Meruse
agreement like the bureaucrats in
Brussels in order to bypass the decision
and rights of the member states. This is
a conspiracy. This is a coup d'et. There
is no other way to say it. There is a
conspiracy against member states and the
fear that this could then happen in
other areas and to others, not just
This is a realistic fear. This must be
stopped. I wonder if the member states
will be able to reign in Brussels. This
is necessary and urgent. The European
leadership has many sins. So, the
current European leadership has some
historical mistakes that can be
classified as crimes. Such was this
completely chaotic mindless method of
the transition which destroyed European
economies. First support for migration.
The second war is the third. I have to
say that there have been such leadership
mistakes here in the recent period. They
have led the European Union, the
European member states into such a dead
end that we should no longer argue about
it. But slowly, someone needs to point
out who is responsible. How did we get
here? They ruined the entire European
economy. When Vander Lion came into
office, this was a competitive region.
There was no talk of war. This was a
peace project. We are at war now. Well,
someone is responsible. That's why we
got here. Here is failure, failure after
failure. So, I think that breaking away
from Russian energy is a failure. The
right idea is to have something other
than Russian energy available to the
member states and the continent. Let's
diversify. The more legs you have, the
more stable you are. But cutting
yourself off from the most important
source of supply is stupid and it
clearly goes against Hungarian
interests. So we will always fight this.
We have done quite well so far. Prime
Minister, regarding the separation of
the gypsies, I would like to ask that in
the recent period, countless agreements
have been made with Azerbaijan, the
United States, and other sources so that
they will finally accept the European
fires. We will never, never, never,
never accept a decision to divest from
any energy source because the goal is
not to divest from anything, but to
diversify, to have access to as many
sources as possible. What we are doing
to Russia now is an unreasonable thing
to do. We are cutting ourselves off from
one of the most abundant and cheapest
resources. It is completely unjustified,
senseless, economically irrational. Of
course, we have to buy from others. It
will be necessary in the next period as
well. In fact, we are not just buying
oil and gas. We are buying entire
fields. So now Hungary has entered that
historical period when we are no longer
responding to our own energy exposure by
just buying from different countries and
diversifying. But Hungary sometimes its
state-owned company MVM sometimes one of
the large private companies MOL is
buying fields. So now Hungary owns oil
and gas fields and we must continue this
policy. And are these short-term sources
competitive in price with Russia? Well,
this trade belongs to the traders. We
will definitely represent ourselves
regarding the Fouseac regulation. We
will continue the discussions about what
it is actually about. This cannot be
interpreted in the language of Hungarian
law. So, you can't question something.
We don't know of such a thing in
Hungarian law when something can't be
questioned. In one case there is such a
thing the holocaust denial that a fact
cannot be denied. But otherwise the
existence of the bin's decrees that they
exist is a fact that no one denies. We
will say that it is good that it is. We
have to leave it like this. It can be
changed. So I think we should first
clarify what exactly the new law is
about. We are also in contact with the
Hungarians in the uplands and then we
will see how we should proceed. Well,
our calendar is full. We'll see sooner
or later for sure. That's true. We'll
veto it. Yes. Sorry, I don't want to
joke. So, the point is the plan so far
has been to use Russian assets to
finance Ukraine, which I think is an
open declaration of war. So now that we
think about it, what are we talking
about? There are two countries that are
at war with each other. One of them will
have his assets seized more than €200
Then the one who sees this who is a
third actor not involved in the war but
in the Ukrainian Russian war. This actor
will take and give this asset to one of
the waring parties. What is this? This
is a declaration of war. This is
entering a war. So, this would be a
terrible mistake if we made it. But I
see from today's news that in the
afternoon's background negotiations, it
seems like we won. And tomorrow, we will
no longer talk about frozen Russian
assets. Because what was said earlier
has finally been understood and will
probably be taken off the table. But
then the question arises, if they want
to continue the war, how should it
happen? And the proposal on the Belgian
table will be to take out a joint loan
which is unacceptable for Hungary. And
according to our calculations, war is
expensive and peace is cheap. They say
they die in war, but no one will give in
to peace. So we propose that we put
aside the whole strategy, which is a
failed union strategy and a strategy
that supports war. turn around, come out
of this dead end, and start a peace
policy. The easiest way to do this is to
stand behind the president of the United
States and say that the only thing we
have to do now is to help the president
of the United States succeed in creating
peace. We don't have that much to do
now. We don't need to decide anything
